I wrote this newsletter, together with Parts 2 and 3 that will follow shortly, to answer questions I have received and to help explain:
-
Why your tax bill looks the way it does - an eye-popping 21.5% increase compared with last quarter's bill, based on a total increase for 2026 of 10.75%.
- What relief programs may be available.
- What happened during this year's budget process.
If you are a renter, please don't look away. These increases may affect you as well, and some of the relief programs in Part 2 may apply to you, too.
These are big numbers, and I know they are difficult to absorb. My own tax bill increased by approximately $1,620 this year.
Everyone has a perspective on what happened. Mayor Jabbour shared hers in the insert that accompanied your tax bill. Other elected officials have shared theirs by email. There are truths in all of them, even if the conclusions differ.
My perspective is a little different.
Since first being elected in 2015, I have participated in 11 budget cycles. As I shared ad nauseam during the mayoral race, my professional background is in finance, and I have spent the past decade analyzing Hoboken's budgets, debt, reserves, and long-term obligations.
This year, like every other year since 2016 except one, I led the effort to reduce the mayor’s proposed tax increase as much as responsibly possible.
Councilwoman Imus and Council President Ramos were indispensable partners throughout the process this year. Together, we introduced the only financially supported budget amendments, ultimately presenting three separate versions as we continued refining the numbers and building support among our colleagues.
After identifying most of the savings that reduced Mayor Jabbour's original proposal from 24% to the 19% increase she ultimately introduced, we continued to drill down into the numbers.
-
Our first proposed amendment reduced the increase further to approximately 13.5%
-
Our second reduced it to approximately 10.5%.
-
Ultimately, working closely with our colleagues, we reached a compromise at 11.5% - a reduction of more than half from the original proposal.
Could the increase have been lower? Perhaps. But not by much. The narrative you may be hearing about a 3% increase was never financially realistic and relied upon structural changes involving labor contracts, health-care costs, and staffing levels have been discussed by the entire City Council and will take longer to implement and could not have been accomplished within this budget cycle.
Over these three newsletters, starting with this one, I will walk you through what happened, why your bill looks the way it does, and what relief may be available.
So with this, let's begin.
Showing 1 reaction
Sign in with
Facebook Twitter